07 Harley Davidson Sportster 1200
HARLEY-DAVIDSON SPORTSTER 1200 (1995 - 2007) Review
18
At a glance
| Owners' reliability rating: | 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5) |
|---|---|
| Annual servicing cost: | £130 |
| Power: | 64 bhp |
| Seat height: | Low (28.0 in / 710 mm) |
| Weight: | High (562 lbs / 255 kg) |
Prices
New N/A
Used £5,300 - £6,500
Overall rating
Next up: Ride & brakes
4 out of 5 (4/5)
The mid-sized Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster makes a lot of sense. It's got a bit more presence, punch and space than the smaller 883cc family but without the weight and unwieldy feel of the 1340/1450cc big end motorcycles.
- Latest:2021 Harley-Davidson Sportster S review
- Harley-Davidson Sportster model history
It's classic, air cooled Harley – if you want one you'll probably not consider anything else. Full name is the Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster Custom.
Ride quality & brakes
Next up: Engine
2 out of 5 (2/5)
Whisper it – modern Harleys handle ok – nicely even. Sportsbike jockeys who've never tried one may scoff but the Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster manages to be less wallowy than most Japanese cruisers.
Unfortunately short travel suspension on the rear means bumps ruin the ride, especially if you're heavy or carrying a passenger. This Harley-Davidson XL1200C Sportster model only gets a single front disc, which is inadequate – other 1200s got two.
Engine
Next up: Reliability
3 out of 5 (3/5)
The Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster's engine is undeniably crude – but is that a fault or a virtue on a motorcycle like this? No Japanese engine can touch it for character.
It's not that different to the OHV lump that powered Harley's 1957 Sportster. Historic, torquey, vibey it is but sporty it certainly ain't.
But Harleys are about taking it easy and being seen, not rushing about - and the Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster is no exception. Gearbox is equally agricultural yet lovable.
Reliability & build quality
Next up: Value
4 out of 5 (4/5)
The latest Harleys, Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster included, are well built. The American company's really improved things since the 70s and 80s and even the 90s.
The finish is quite durable but remember the Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster is a motorcycle made for posing – any corrosion is a disaster so avoid winter use or clean religiously. Some Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportsters lose a little oil through the air filter so keep an eye on levels.
Value vs rivals
Next up: Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)
The Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster isn't particularly cheap to buy but like all Harleys, depreciation is extremely low. The Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster's fuel consumption is impressive and insurance isn't OTT – but not cheap for the performance – thieves like Harleys.
Maintenance costs are pretty low. The engine's simple (and the valves don't need adjusting on later Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportsters).
Equipment
4 out of 5 (4/5)
Standard equipment on the Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster is not lavish but belt drive is low maintenance. 90% of Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportsters get customised, most commonly from Harley-Davidson's own brand of aftermarket parts, Screamin' Eagle.
Exhausts are common as are jet kits to improve low speed running and prevent stalling. There's a telephone book of accessories to choose from and some even add to the Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster's used value.
Specs | |
| Engine size | 1200cc |
|---|---|
| Engine type | 4v V-twin, 5 gears |
| Frame type | Steel spine |
| Fuel capacity | 17 litres |
| Seat height | 710mm |
| Bike weight | 255kg |
| Front suspension | None |
| Rear suspension | Preload |
| Front brake | 292mm disc |
| Rear brake | 292mm disc |
| Front tyre size | 90/90 x 21 |
| Rear tyre size | 150/80 x 16 |
Mpg, costs & insurance | |
| Average fuel consumption | 48 mpg |
|---|---|
| Annual road tax | £96 |
| Annual service cost | £130 |
| New price | - |
| Used price | £5,300 - £6,500 |
| Insurance group | 13 of 17 How much to insure? |
| Warranty term | Two year unlimited mileage |
Top speed & performance | |
| Max power | 64 bhp |
|---|---|
| Max torque | 69 ft-lb |
| Top speed | 110 mph |
| 1/4 mile acceleration | 13.8 secs |
| Tank range | 175 miles |
Model history & versions
Model history
1995: Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster introduced, replacing the XLH1200.
1997: New sealed battery.
1998: Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster gets new diagnostic port for oil pump.
2000: Uprated disc brakes and seat.
Other versions
Harley-Davidson XL1200S Sportster: 'Sportier' member of the 1200 family. Cast wheels 19" front, 16" rear, twin front discs, flat track handlebars, more sophisticated suspension with cartridge forks. 1985-2003.
Harley-Davidson XL1200R Sportster: Uprated brakes, rubber engine mounts, 19" front, 16" rear wheels. 2003-2005.
MCN Long term test reports
This steampunk Harley-Davidson stands out from the rest
The latest wave of custom bikes are all about simplicity and minimalism. Most of them have tiny brake lights, small front mudguards and a seat not much thicker than a folded up blanket, so this steampunk-inspired Harley-Davidson Forty-Eight is quite refreshing, and certainly stands out. The bike is …
Read the latest report
Owners' reviews for the HARLEY-DAVIDSON SPORTSTER 1200 (1995 - 2007)
18 owners have reviewed their HARLEY-DAVIDSON SPORTSTER 1200 (1995 - 2007) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.
Review your HARLEY-DAVIDSON SPORTSTER 1200 (1995 - 2007)
Summary of owners' reviews | |
| Overall rating: | 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5) |
|---|---|
| Ride quality & brakes: | 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5) |
| Engine: | 3.9 out of 5 (3.9/5) |
| Reliability & build quality: | 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5) |
| Value vs rivals: | 4.5 out of 5 (4.5/5) |
| Equipment: | 3.7 out of 5 (3.7/5) |
| Annual servicing cost: | £130 |
5 out of 5 Sportster loving St Tropez in the Sun.
21 November 2016
Version: custom xlc
Year: 2012
Annual servicing cost: £120
Best bike I have ever owned (but I live in the South of France where weather is fabulous) These bikes suit good weather as UK rain, road grime, salt & dirt kills these bikes. Of all the bikes I have owned since 1973 this is the most fun & my wife loves to get on the back of it too. Its not a UK or City daily commuter, but I really cant fault this bike, I love everything about it.
Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Again, surprisingly good, first thought it should have twin front discs but unless you ride crazy then you don't need it, these are not race bikes, they are cruisers, frame can bottom out on ramps when 2 up, but not if you go easy over ramps.
Engine 5 out of 5
V twin is gorgeous, huge power & torque, great fun even at low revs & speed. Not sure I'd bother with the 883, just cant see the point in the smaller engine & it looks somewhat inferior to the 1200 version.
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Harleys are so well built now, engineering and quality is fabulous & that includes the fantastic range of extras you can buy for it to customise to your taste. Vibration is surprisingly low, I'd never owned a Harley before & was pleased with how little shock there was. There is no vibration to the mirrors at all, none of the old problems we heard about in owning & running the 60's to 90's Harleys. Modern & efficient Fuel Injection puts all the Carburation problems in the past.
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Hardly expensive to buy these bikes & great value for money looking at what you get. Easy to do all the maintenance yourself but buy the huge Harley Workshop (Telephone Directory size) Manual, about £60 - but worth every penny.
Equipment 5 out of 5
Basic 1200 Custom XLC model standard is good enough as is, so much beautiful chrome & alloy, but even better with additional pieces added.. Custom seat & back rest essential if going two-up, engine crash bars advisable in the event of the unavoidable upset.
Buying experience: Bought second hand (previous owners had spent most of the money on expensive extras) but visits to Harley Davidson dealers have been pleasurable, great on parts & extras, merchandise is incredible & its become a modern lifestyle to be enjoyed.
5 out of 5 Another One In A heartbeat!
07 September 2016 by John Brewster
Version: XL 1200C
Year: 1995
I would recommend this to a friend if he was looking for an easy to handle cruiser. Has more than adequate acceleration as long as you are not looking for 11 sec 1/4 miles. Looks good, gets attention. I have to laugh when ladies in convertibles hit on me until I take my helmet off (I'm 70) sometimes even that doesn't put them off. If you are a lady on one, better brush up on your standards because you'll get the same thing.
Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
I've done 7-8 hours at a stretch but then I'm kinda hard core. ( or Corps, I am a retired Marine). We did get a seat with more cush for the passenger and my wife was a lot happier. Did a tour of Vancouver Island and ran outta time, stopped in Naniamo over night, next day all the way to Amity Or, stopping only for gas. 375 miles. Brakes good for the way I ride (like I stole it) but dual fronts would be nice.
Engine 4 out of 5
No such thing as an engine with enough power!
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Never broken down. As far as rust is concerned, the only parts that have rusted were after-market. I clean my bike but I also ride in the rain, no problems.
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Had it too long to remember all the yearly costs but either we have good dealers in the area or I am just lucky because I have found that when it comes to service, you get what you pay for.
Equipment 5 out of 5
Favorite feature as standard...the bike. Change the exhaust, the cam, the carb, the ignition. (See previous comment about engine power.) Tyres (as you say), don't waste money on racing profiles, you are going to drag something long before any quality cruising tyre loses traction.
Buying experience: Bought used from a dealer. good experience and the enjoyment is worth the price. (it's a '95 by the way)
5 out of 5 GO FIND ONE...THEN BUY IT !
18 August 2016 by Lee
Version: XL1200S, SPORTSTER SPORT
Year: 2002
It's not in the same bracket as a Fireblade ,but if you can keep that in mind, then the xl1200s DOES handle ! !... I've had mine 12 long very happy years, ,spent quite a bit on upgrades etc but the smile on my face when i ride it is worth every penny , , , had it 12 years and the drivebelt snapping when i engaged 1st (in my garden) is as close to a breakdown as I've ever had, it's NEVER broken down or left me stranded...Upgrades I've put on, screaming eagles ,stainless braided brake pipes, forcewinder air intake kit, bellypan, and, and, and, and. But the exhaust, air intake and brakes are very good upgrades, it's done 38,000 miles and it will eat a standard Dyna all day ! much to their annoyance, it's got twin plug heads and take off is nothing short of awesome.
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
Buying experience: DEALER
4 out of 5 Sportster
22 November 2015 by The Mad Jock
Version: Custom
Year: 2004
Annual servicing cost: £130
Best thing about my bike is the smile and the feeling I get when I'm out on it. No frills just fun and I wouldn't swap it for anything. Worst and only fault is that I really should swap the suspension for something that would make the two up experience better
Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Great for day trips and crusing around the county solo. Not so good two up, needs slightly stiffer suspension when two up as it bottoms out on speed humps and some rougher B class roads.
Engine 3 out of 5
Needs a little more BHP
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Needed a new battery after about 7-8yrs and I've replaced the standard pipes for Vance and Hines. Making it slightly better than it was. Never broke down and only had starting problems when the original battery needed replacing
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
My Sportster is 11 years old and still feels like new. Servicing is not as expensive as I'd been told it would be. But it does need to be on trickle charge when not in use to keep battery in good nick
Equipment 2 out of 5
what equipment. This is bare bone no frills old school and I love it
Buying experience: Bought from West Coast Harleys in Glasgow and even though I'm over 100 miles away i will use them again. 1st class
4 out of 5 Sportster
22 November 2015 by The Mad Jock
Version: Custom
Year: 2004
Annual servicing cost: £130
Best thing about my bike is the smile and the feeling I get when I'm out on it. No frills just fun and I would'nt swap it for anything. Worst and only fault is that I really should swap the suspension for something that would make the two up experience better
Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Great for day trips and crusing around the county solo. Not so good two up, needs slightly stiffer suspension when two up as it bottoms out on speed humps and some rougher B class roads.
Engine 3 out of 5
Needs a little more BHP
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Needed a new battery after about 7-8yrs and I've replaced the standard pipes for Vance and Hines. Making it slightly better than it was. Never broke down and only had starting problems when the original battery needed replacing
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
My Sportster is 11 years old and still feels like new. Servicing is not as expensive as I'd been told it would be. But it does need to be on trickle charge when not in use to keep battery in good nick
Equipment 2 out of 5
what equipment. This is bare bone no frills old school and I love it
Buying experience: Bought from West Coast Harleys in Glasgow and even though I'm over 100 miles away i will use them again. 1st class
4 out of 5
30 September 2015 by Don
Version: XLH
Year: 1995
It tickles me when i hear folks say, "yeah i have a Softail, my wife has the Sportster". Or whatever people say. The sportsters are a bit smaller than their more expensive siblings, and very fast. The 1200. (i've paid my tax and you can google it if you don't know what i mean) really can be faster than most traffic. A sport bike lover once told me, "mines faster but yours is a work of art". The true bikers are brand centric or brand offensive right? Thats my view anyway. The 1200 represents the 1950s and even thru the 1970s, classic motorcycle lines. I've put 15000 miles on mine, and would sell all possessions prior to selling my 95. The rear ride (im about 140lbs) can be a bit stiff, and honestly with a 2nd rider it smooths out. Probably some softer shocks would help me i just haven't gotten around to it. I've kept mine clean, it presents very strongly, especially amongst todays baggage laden, computer driven ignition etc etc. What kind of fuel pump does this motorcycle have? I tell people "im standing on it"..its called gravity....As some have said, the bike isn't modern, but it sure is lively, fun, with Pirelli Route 66 tires, really handles nimbly in my opinion. I have ZERO desire to "trade up". This bike IS up. It requires no justification, it fits well, I've taken it on multi hour cross country rides, and around town. In some senses, for this reviewer, it is a perfect machine. Not THE perfect machine, but as Robert Pirsig aptly wrote "..the real test, is the satisfaction the machine gives, there really is no other test". In this case, the Harley Davidson 1200, jetted, exhaust opened up, and air cleaner intake mod (i substituted my 'ham can' for a good old fashioned ROUND air cleaner), is an immensely gratifying ride. I respect all the rest i really do, from street dirt to bullet, rocket cruiser etc. This is the motorcycle i was made to ride, and cannot but recommend it.
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Add Stage 1
09 February 2010 by DonaldB
When I bought the XL1200C I found it comfortable and the handling good for a custom but the performance was rubbish for a 1200cc. I added Screamin Eagle pipes and a Stage 1 Thunder Slide kit to the carb, set the mixture a little rich via the adjustable needle (Trial and Error)and what a difference, goes more like a Buell than a Harley and calmed the vibration down a bit too. Well worth some time in the garage.
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 3 out of 5
4 out of 5 Just lie back and enjoy it
29 June 2009 by EnglishTexan
Covered about 2,500 miles on mine so far. Stage 1 exhausts, etc. Engine vibration took some getting used to, esp. at low revs, but secret sees to be in rider attitude - don't rush it, just cruise at around 55/60mph and you'll love it, and have lots in hand if needed. Surprisingly comfortable and easy in traffic. Dual discs mean brakes are fine. You WILL spend lots of money on customisation! 52mpg.
Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 2 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 3 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 fun fun fun
31 March 2007 by lance-jack
Had one for five years, foolishly sold it to get a Fatboy. Stage one with open pipes, solo seat, 16" apes, forkbrace ( it did make a wee bit of difference ), etc. Rode it all year round. Front brake is pants, but if you keep on top off it, it can do the job ( add braided hoses and don't skimp on the quality pads ). Rear brake fine. Riding position was good, longest covered in one day was about 340 miles. Good gas milage on the motorway, but I had a small tank ( 2 gallons ) on mine so frequent top-ups needed. Oil consumption wasn't a problem. Parts can be expensive but the second-hand market is very good and if you punt around you can get some real cheap parts to keep you going ( buy you service items from the states with a mate or two, get 'em for half the UK, including the postage. Change your oil frequently, it does make a difference. Cover the external parts that can corrode quite quickly with Corrosion X ( used in the aircraft industry ). If you don't want to buy chrome parts you can once again get the standard parts very cheaply, as most people buy shiney bits and biff the standard finish. Loved it, would have one again any time. Don't let Harley snobbery put you off. Some think that Sportsters are not "big" or "real" Harleys. This is B.S. Think of it more as an evolution from the big old British bikes in their day. Best off all, get an older one ( post '91, with the five speed box. Trust me, it makes a difference on motorways! ) for £2500, ride it for a while, if you don't like it you will get your money back on it. Cheers!
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 2 out of 5
5 out of 5 Awesome custom road bike for UK summer riding.
26 July 2006 by Motoguzzifan
Get the stage one modification carried out. This takes off the draconian engine restrictions that Harley Davidson put in place (amusingly called "Harley Tax"). It rides fine before. It rides even better after the stage one modification has been carried out! Strengths: Tremendous torque of the engine. Awesome Harley Davidson V-Twin rumble. Lack of need to be travelling at 90+ mph all the time, like when you are on a sports bike. Weaknesses: Engine vibration at "real" motorway cruising speeds (you know, like 90+ mph). Lovely at 70 -80 mph. Perfectly capable of overtaking at up to 100+mph, you just wouldn't want to keep it there for any length of time!
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 2006 1200R - bought new
22 May 2006 by Armand_Tanzarian
Traded in a Kawasaki W650 for this. Had the Stage One done from scratch which does improve performance but makes a hell of a noise. It even began to annoy me, let alone the neigbours. Changed back to standard pipes after a 1000 miles. "Rolling thunder" has now been replaced by "Passing Flatulence". How hard can it be to achieve a happy medium (obviously too hard for HD). Now I have the quiet pipes on I'm amazed how clattery the engine is. The bike is penty fast enough (about 100mph) but is hard work on the motorway. The twin front disks are perfectly good (unlike the single disk on the custom and 883, which barely works at all). The Sportster is a bit like a 60s muscle car. Great to look at, good for a laugh, but not really that practical. Strengths: Looks great, good fun for short blasts. Weaknesses: <br>A bit crude, hard work above 70MPH.
Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 4 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 Forget the Sports-bike ethic and you will love it!
15 October 2005 by dickthebuttockscruttock
I have recently taken my first step into the cruiser market and bought a Harley 1200 Sportster Custom. I have always had Japanese sports bikes in the past and increasingly moved up the speed scale...Gsxr6, Fireblade, Blackbird, R1. In the end I got so fed-up with the frustration of riding a sports bike on the road I decided to take up racing instead, and vowed never to have a sports bike on the road again. Cutting a long story short - Totally forget about the speed thing before you even buy this bike.... vibes,easy torquey cruising and shop window posing is what this bike is all about. Lots of people asking you about the bike wherever you stop, and no worries/pressures about speed camera's, knee down's and wheelies. Whilst still getting my speed fix on the track, this has been a breath of fresh air on the road. Try to go for a bike with as many extras fitted as poss, as harley bits are pricey. RECOMMENDED :o) Strengths: Sound "with decent pipes and filter". Torque, Chrome, Harley street cred. Weaknesses: Suspension on Custom models a bit crude/harsh. Better on Sport models aparently. Some models lose a tiny bit of oil through the air-filter...sorted with a £25 kit. Cleaning it is a bit of a bugger!
Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
07 November 2002 by Gromit
Never thought I'd ever own a Harley but you know what? It's just great fun - I've escaped the sportsbike rat-race and am really enjoying biking once again. You can have a lot of fun below 80mph and this bike is proof - and when it looks and sounds this good, who cares if it doesn't have 140bhp? 1200 conversion well worth having - makes a huge difference and doesn't cost a fortune. Sportsters are all about biking in its crudest, most basic form - long may it continue!! I'm a convert.<br><br>
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
06 September 2002 by aappdd
Bloody marvelous! Sounds fantastic, very economical, never ridden a bike thats generated so much comment and intertest, just love ridding it. Buy an 883 and convert it to a 1200 - have ridden conversion and not only v.quick (for a Harley) but you build a great 1200 for less than it costs to buy standard. If you don't believe me then check out www.sportster.org. My only piece of advice - if your a sports bike rider/fan DON'T BY A SPORTSTER or any H-D for that matter, I guarantee you won't like it.<br><br><br>
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
5 out of 5 My Review
16 August 2002 by yobnhoj
Before I owned this bike ( h-d xl833r)and as a born again biker who had never ridden a bike biggger than a 250 in the last 33 years, I had in 4 years bought new a cbr250rr, vt250, hornet 600, ducati 750 monster, and a 20001 cbr600 f4i. Since I think knees down, stoppies and wheelies are total crap I bought a harley- davidson xl883r sportster where my feet sit directly below my knees, the handle bars allow the mirrors to see pass my shoulders , I have a belt drive, hydraulic tappets, twin disc front end, a front end that is rock solid, a great colour scheme and design and "the" badge. If this bike doesn't give you the urge check your pulse... I also still have the monster.<br>
Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5
Engine 5 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
22 January 2002 by burgs
The coolest bike on the road<br><br>
Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5
Engine 4 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
1 out of 5 My Review
21 January 2002 by markbru
This shite is noisy, unreliable and uncomfortable., I chopped in a perfectly good thundercat for this lump of crap, what a mistake that was.It nearly vibrates itself to pieces, it overheats and handles like a pig.Oh, and it breaks down and cant get fuel into the engine. I'd not even give one of these to someone I strongly disliked. Its for sale now-someone please buy this and end my nightmare.Grin Factor? Only when people come up to me and say how wonderful it must be to own a Hog!!<br><br>
Ride quality & brakes 1 out of 5
Engine 1 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 My Review
04 January 2002 by bikerdavid
It's a basic Harley, so all the usual stuff applies: It looks great (if you like Harleys) You get laughed at (by people who don't like Harleys) It sounds great (at least it does now, after the Stage 1) It accelerates well enough around town. It is slow everywhere else. Stock brakes were crap - but the 4-pot PM brakes are more than enough. It vibrates. After an hour you lose all feeling in your hands. You don't want to go above 70 with the screen fitted. I always wanted a Harley, and was not dissapointed with this one. I have just traded it in for a Heritage Classic, but I miss my old Sportster!<br><br>
Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5
Engine 3 out of 5
Reliability & build quality 2 out of 5
Value vs rivals 5 out of 5
Equipment 4 out of 5
Back to top
Harley-Davidson XL1200 Sportster motorcycle review - Riding
07 Harley Davidson Sportster 1200
Source: https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-reviews/harley-davidson/sportster-1200/1995/
0 Komentar